AskDwightHow.org 365/24/7
⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ ⬆️ Through every step along the way, you've got the tools to seize the day
14m 24s

We'll get your problem solved one way or the other. Open this door



How to Know a Person:
The Art of Seeing Others Deeply
and Being Deeply Seen
by David Brooks
After finishing this book in January of 2024, I wrote,
"As a life and lifestyle coach since 1987, others are often surprised at how well I know them. However, I still had something to learn from David Brooks. Highly recommended."
Open these doors also: 37-Questions and How to have a great conversation with anyone.
My clippings below collapse a 304-page book into 10 pages, measured by using 12-point type in Microsoft Word."
See all my book recommendations.
Here are the selections I made:
The real act of , say , building a friendship or creating a community involves performing a series of small , concrete social actions well : disagreeing without poisoning the relationship ; revealing vulnerability at the appropriate pace ; being a good listener ; knowing how to end a conversation gracefully ; knowing how to ask for and offer forgiveness ; knowing how to let someone down without breaking their heart ; knowing how to sit with someone who is suffering ; knowing how to host a gathering where everyone feels embraced ; knowing how to see things from another’s point of view .
These are some of the most important skills a human being can possess , and yet we don’t teach them in school .
As a result , a lot of us are lonely and lack deep friendships .
On social media , stimulation replaces intimacy . There is judgment everywhere and understanding nowhere .
And all these different skills rest on one foundational skill : the ability to understand what another person is going through . There is one skill that lies at the heart of any healthy person , family , school , community organization , or society : the ability to see someone else deeply and make them feel seen — to accurately know another person , to let them feel valued , heard , and understood .
I often ask people to tell me about times they’ve felt seen , and with glowing eyes they tell me stories about pivotal moments in their life .
They say there is no such thing as an ordinary person . When you’re beholding someone , you’re seeing the richness of this particular human consciousness , the full symphony — how they perceive and create their life .
Fierce Attachments is a brilliant description of seeing but not really seeing . Here are two smart , dynamic , highly verbal women in lifelong communication who are never quite able to understand each other . Gornick’s book is so good because it illustrates that even in cases where we’re devoted to a person , and know a lot about them , it’s still possible to not see them . You can be loved by a person yet not be known by them .
Part of the reason the Gornicks can’t see each other is because they pay attention only to the effect the other has on them . Vivian and Bess are belligerents locked in a struggle over where the blame is going to lie .
Being an Illuminator , seeing other people in all their fullness , doesn’t just happen . It’s a craft , a set of skills , a way of life . Other cultures have words for this way of being . The Koreans call it nunchi , the ability to be sensitive to other people’s moods and thoughts . The Germans ( of course ) have a word for it : herzensbildung , training one’s heart to see the full humanity in another .
You may find the whole idea of God ridiculous , but I ask you to believe in the concept of a soul . You may just be chatting with someone about the weather , but I ask you to assume that the person in front of you contains some piece of themselves that has no weight , size , color , or shape yet gives them infinite value and dignity .
In his book Consolations , the essayist and poet David Whyte observed that the ultimate touchstone of friendship “ is not improvement , neither of the other nor of the self , the ultimate touchstone is witness , the privilege of having been seen by someone and the equal privilege of being granted the sight of the essence of another , to have walked with them and to have believed in them , sometimes just to have accompanied them for however brief a span , on a journey impossible to accomplish alone . ”
Aldous Huxley captured the core reality : “ Experience is not what happens to you , it’s what you do with what happens to you . ”
The crucial question is not “ What happened to this person ? ” or “ What are the items on their résumé ? ” Instead , we should ask : “ How does this person interpret what happened ? How does this person see things ? How do they construct their reality ? ”
Or , as the writer Anaïs Nin put it , “ We do not see things as they are , we see things as we are . ”
Constructionism is the recognition , backed up by the last half century of brain research , that people don’t passively take in reality . Each person actively constructs their own perception of reality . That’s not to say there is not an objective reality out there . It’s to say that we have only subjective access to it . “ The mind is its own place , ” the poet John Milton wrote , “ and in itself / Can make a Heaven of Hell , a Hell of Heaven . ”
George Bernard Shaw got it right : “ Life isn’t about finding yourself . Life is about creating yourself . ” SIX Good Talks
The subtitle of this book is “ The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen . ” I chose that specifically because I wanted you to immediately get what I was writing about .
If what we’re doing here is studying how to really get to know another person , it should probably be “ The Art of Hearing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Heard . ” Because getting to know someone else is usually more about talking and listening than about seeing .
A good conversationalist is capable of leading people on a mutual expedition toward understanding .
A good conversation is an act of joint exploration . Somebody floats a half - formed idea . Somebody else seizes on the nub of the idea , plays with it , offers her own perspective based on her own memories , and floats it back so the other person can respond . A good conversation sparks you to have thoughts you never had before . A good conversation starts in one place and ends up in another .
You’re going to apply what some experts call the SLANT method : sit up , lean forward , ask questions , nod your head , track the speaker . Listen with your eyes . That’s paying attention 100 percent .
FAVOR FAMILIARITY . You might think that people love to hear and talk about things that are new and unfamiliar . In fact , people love to talk about the movie they have already seen, the game they already watched .
MAKE THEM AUTHORS , NOT WITNESSES . People aren’t specific enough when they tell stories . They tend to leave out the concrete details. But if you ask them specific questions — “ Where was your boss sitting when he said that? And what did you say in response? ” — they are likely to revisit the moment in a more vivid way .
Good conversationalists ask for stories about specific events or experiences , and then they go even further . They don’t only want to talk about what happened , they want to know how you experienced what happened . They want to understand what you were feeling when your boss told you that you were being laid off . Was your first thought “ How will I tell my family? ” Was your dominant emotion dread, humiliation, or perhaps relief ? Then a good conversationalist will ask how you’re experiencing now what you experienced then. In retrospect, was getting laid off a complete disaster , or did it send you off on a new path that you’re now grateful for ?
That means she’ll wait for the end of the other person’s comment , and then pause for a few beats to consider how to respond to what’s been said , holding up her hand , so the other person doesn’t just keep on talking . Taking that extra breath creates space for reflection .
Psychologists have a concept they call looping . That’s when you repeat what someone just said in order to make sure you accurately received what they were trying to project .
Looping forces you to listen more carefully . Other people will sense the change in you . Looping is also a good way to keep the other person focused on their core point , rather than drifting away on some tangent .
“ Even when we can’t agree on Dad’s medical care , I’ve never doubted your good intentions . I know we both want the best for him . ” If you can both return to the gem statement during a conflict , you can keep the relationship between you strong .
The more interesting thing to do is to ask , “ Why , at heart , do we disagree ? What is the values disagreement underneath our practical disagreement ? ” Maybe you disagree on gun regulations because deep down you have radically different notions of public safety or of the role of government , or maybe one of you is from a rural town and the other is from a city . When you search for the disagreement under the disagreement , you are looking for the moral , philosophical roots of why you each believe what you do . You’re engaged in a mutual exploration .
DON’T BE A TOPPER . If somebody tells you they are having trouble with their teenage son , don’t turn around and say , “ I know exactly what you mean . I’m having incredible problems with my Steven . ”
The lesson she has drawn from her experience is the same lesson I have learned : “ The experience of being listened to all the way on something — until your meaning is completely clear to another human being — is extremely rare in life . ”
In my case , he asked me about three topics : my ultimate goals ( What do you want to offer the world ? ) , my skills ( What are you doing when you feel most alive ? ) , and my schedule ( How exactly do you fill your days ? ) . These were questions that lifted me out of the daily intricacies of my schedule and forced me to look at the big picture .
The first thing he is looking for when he hires someone , he says , is “ extreme talent . ” He defines this narrowly . He doesn’t want someone who says they love teaching in general ; he wants to hear someone identify the specific teaching task they excel at : I love writing out a lesson plan . Or I love working with remedial students . Or I love one - on - one tutoring . “ People love to do the thing they are wired to do , ” he says . A person can go a long way with a narrow skill set .
“ Take me back to when you were born . ” In this way he can get people out of talking about their professional life and into talking about their personal life .
The worst kinds of questions are the ones that don’t involve a surrender of power , that evaluate : Where did you go to college ? What neighborhood do you live in ? What do you do ? They imply , “ I’m about to judge you . ” Closed questions are also bad questions . Instead of surrendering power , the questioner is imposing a limit on how the question can be answered . For example , if you mention your mother and I ask , “ Were you close ? , ” then I’ve limited your description of your relationship with your mother to the close / distant frame . It’s better to ask , “ How is your mother ? ” That gives the answerer the freedom to go as deep or as shallow as he wants . A third sure way to shut down conversations is to ask vague questions , like “ How’s it going ? ” or “ What’s up ? ” These questions are impossible to answer . They’re another way of saying , “ I’m greeting you , but I don’t actually want you to answer . ” Humble questions are open - ended . They’re encouraging the other person to take control and take the conversation where they want it to go . These are questions that begin with phrases like “ How did you … , ” “ What’s it like … , ” “ Tell me about … , ” and “ In what ways … ” In her book You’re Not Listening , Kate Murphy describes a focus group moderator who was trying to understand why people go to the grocery store late at night . Instead of directly asking , “ Why do you go to grocery stores late , ” which can sound accusatory , she asked , “ Tell me about the last time you went to the store after 11 : 00 p.m . ”
I’ve learned to sometimes ask , “ Where did you grow up ? ” which gets people talking about their hometown . I travel a lot for work , so there’s a good chance I’ll know something about their place . Other easy introductory questions are things like “ That’s a lovely name . How did your parents choose it ? ” That prompts conversations about cultural background and family history . Those conversations often go off in good directions .
Recently I was at a dinner with a political scientist who put down his fork and said to the four of us : “ I’m eighty . What should I do with the rest of my life ? ” That was a really humble but big question to ask . Essentially , he was asking , “ What is the best way to grow old ? ” We started talking about his values , the questions he wanted to ask in his future research , how anyone should spend the final years of their life . It was fantastic .
“ What crossroads are you at ? ” At any moment , most of us are in the middle of some transition . The question helps people focus on theirs . “ What would you do if you weren’t afraid ? ” Most people know that fear plays some role in their life , but they haven’t clearly defined how fear is holding them back .
“ If you died tonight , what would you regret not doing ? ” “ If we meet a year from now , what will we be celebrating ? ” “ If the next five years is a chapter in your life , what is that chapter about ? ” “ Can you be yourself where you are and still fit in ? ”
Here are some of his : “ What is the no , or refusal , you keep postponing ? … What have you said yes to that you no longer really believe in ? … What forgiveness are you withholding ? … How have you contributed to the problem you’re trying to solve ? … What is the gift you currently hold in exile ? ”
Mónica Guzmán , the journalist I quoted in the last chapter , asks people , “ Why you ? ” Why was it you who started that business ? Why was it you who felt a responsibility to run for the school board ?
“ Tell me about a time you adapted to change . ” “ What’s working really well in your life ? ” “ What are you most self - confident about ? ” “ Which of your five senses is strongest ? ” “ Have you ever been solitary without feeling lonely ? ” or “ What has become clearer to you as you have aged ? ”
I asked these experts how often somebody looks back at them and says , “ None of your damn business . ” Every expert I consulted had basically the same answer : “ Almost never . ” People are longing to be asked questions about who they are . “ The human need to self - present is powerful , ” notes the psychologist Ethan Kross .
Each person is a mystery . And when you are surrounded by mysteries , as the saying goes , it’s best to live life in the form of a question .
Part 2: I See You in Your Struggles
According to research by Ryan Streeter of the American Enterprise Institute , lonely people are seven times more likely than non - lonely people to say they are active in politics . For people who feel disrespected and unseen , politics is a seductive form of social therapy .
Politics seems to offer a sense of belonging . I am on the barricades with the other members of my tribe . Politics seems to offer an arena of moral action . To be moral in this world , you don’t have to feed the hungry or sit with the widow . You just have to be liberal or conservative , you just have to feel properly enraged at the people you find contemptible .
In 1966 , nearly 90 percent said they were strongly motivated to develop a meaningful philosophy of life , the most popular of all life goals . In 2000 , only 42 percent said that . Instead , the most important life goal was being well - off financially . In 2015 , 82 percent of students said financial success was what school was primarily for .
In 2018 , the Pew Research Center asked Americans what gives them meaning in life . Only 7 percent said helping other people . Only 11 percent said that learning was a source of meaning in their life .
Your next job is to encourage them to go into more depth about what they have just said . “ I want to understand your point of view as much as possible . What am I missing here ? ” Curiosity is the ability to explore something even in stressful and difficult circumstances
Micah Goodman , who teaches at Hebrew University of Jerusalem , once told me , “ A great conversation is between two people who think the other is wrong . A bad conversation is between those who think something is wrong with you . ”
You might say , “ You and I have just expressed some strong emotions . Unfortunately , against each other . But at least our hearts are out on the table and we’ve both been exposed . Weirdly , we have a chance to understand each other better because of the mistakes we’ve made , the emotions we’ve aroused . ”
When Joseph surveyed people who had experienced train bombings and other terrorist attacks , he found that 46 percent reported that their view of life had changed for the worse , and 43 percent said their view of life had changed for the better .
Psychologists recommend that you ask your friend to fill in the blanks to these two statements : “ In our family , the one thing you must never do is _____ ” and “ In our family , the one thing you must do above all else is ________ . ” That’s a way to help a person see more clearly the deep values that were embedded in the way they were raised .
Part 3: I See You with Your Strengths
EXTROVERSION . We often think of extroverts as people who derive energy from other people . In fact , people who score high in extroversion are highly drawn to all positive emotions . They are excited by any chance to experience pleasure , to seek thrills , to win social approval . They are motivated more by the lure of rewards than the fear of punishment .
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS . If extroverts are the people you want livening up your party , those who score high in conscientiousness are often the ones you want managing your organization . People who score high on this trait have excellent impulse control . They are disciplined , persevering , organized , self - regulating . They have the ability to focus on long - term goals and not get distracted .
NEUROTICISM . If extroverts are drawn to positive emotions , people who score high in neuroticism respond powerfully to negative emotions . They feel fear , anxiety , shame , disgust , and sadness very quickly and very acutely . They are sensitive to potential threats . They are more likely to worry than to be calm , more highly strung than laid - back , more vulnerable than resilient .
AGREEABLENESS . Those who score high on agreeableness are good at getting along with people . They are compassionate , considerate , helpful , and accommodating toward others . Such people tend to be trusting , cooperative , and kind — good - natured rather than foul - tempered , softhearted rather than hard - edged , polite more than rude , forgiving more than vengeful .
OPENNESS . If agreeableness describes a person’s relationship to other people , openness describes their relationship to information . People who score high on this trait are powerfully motivated to have new experiences and to try on new ideas . They tend to be innovative more than conventional , imaginative and associative rather than linear , curious more than closed - minded . They tend not to impose a predetermined ideology on the world and to really enjoy cognitive exploration , just wandering around in a subject .
As Seneca put it , “ Nature’s wants are small , while those of opinion are limitless . ” This also leads to a lot of conformism . You’ll see cliques of adolescents — and even adults — at the mall all wearing the same types of clothes , speaking with the same vocal tones .
The psychologist Daniel Gilbert has a famous saying about this : “ Human beings are works in progress that mistakenly think they are finished . ”
He asks people , for example , to tell him about the high points of their lives , the low points , and the turning points . Half the people he interviews end up crying at some point , recalling some hard event in their lives .
At the end of the session , most of them are elated . They tell him that no one has ever asked them about their life story before . Some of them want to give the research fee back . “ I don’t want to take money for this , ” they say . “ This has been the best afternoon I’ve had in a long time . ”
The psychologist Jerome Bruner distinguished between two different modes of thinking , which he called the paradigmatic mode and the narrative mode .
So when I’m in a conversation with someone now , I’m trying to push against that and get us into narrative mode . I’m no longer content to ask , “ What do you think about X ? ” Instead , I ask , “ How did you come to believe X ? ” This is a framing that invites people to tell a story about what events led them to think the way they do . Similarly , I don’t ask people to tell me about their values ; I say , “ Tell me about the person who shaped your values most . ” That prompts a story .
Then there is the habit of taking people back in time : Where’d you grow up ? When did you know that you wanted to spend your life this way ? I’m not shy about asking people about their childhoods : What did you want to be when you were a kid ? What did your parents want you to be ? Finally , I try to ask about intentions and goals . When people are talking to you about their intentions , they are implicitly telling you about where they have been and where they hope to go .
About half of all people address themselves in the second person as “ you ” often or all the time . Some people use their own name when talking to themselves . By the way , the people who address themselves in the second or even the third person have less anxiety , give better speeches , complete tasks more efficiently , and communicate more effectively . If you’re able to self - distance in this way , you should .
Sometimes it seems we’re no more in charge of our voice than we are of our dreams . Or as William James put it , “ Thoughts themselves are the thinkers . ”
The WEIRDest People in the World . In it , he makes the point that those of us in our Western , Educated , Industrialized , Rich , and Democratic culture are complete outliers when compared to most other cultures in world history .
People who grew up in WEIRD cultures , Henrich finds , are much less conformist than people in most other cultures . They are more loyal to universal ideals and maybe a little less loyal to friends . For example , while most people in Nepal , Venezuela , or South Korea would lie under oath to help a friend , 90 percent of Americans and Canadians do not think their friends have a right to expect such a thing .
A study asked fifteen thousand people around the world if they’d prefer a job in which individual initiative is encouraged or one in which no one is singled out for honor but everybody works as a team . More than 90 percent of American , British , Dutch , and Swedish respondents chose the individual initiative job . But fewer than 50 percent of Japanese and Singaporean respondents did .
One researcher in China found that the divorce rate for people in historic wheat - farming regions was 50 percent higher than the divorce rate for those from historic rice - farming regions .
People from eastern England tended to settle in New England , people from southern England went to Virginia , people from the English Midlands went to Pennsylvania , and people from northern England went to Appalachia . This was all roughly 350 years ago .
The eastern English who settled New England , Fischer writes , were highly moralistic , had an acute awareness of social sin , strongly valued education , were very industrious , were highly time conscious , were emotionally buttoned up , valued town halls , and were active in civic life . That sounds a lot like New England today . Those from southern England who went to Virginia were more aristocratic . They built , when they could afford it , palatial homes , and had extended patriarchal families . They liked showy and frilly clothing , were more comfortable with class differences , and were less obsessed about staying on the clock .
Those who moved from northern England to Appalachia favored a more militant Christianity and ascribed to an honor culture . They were more violent and put a greater emphasis on clan and kin . Their child - rearing techniques fostered a fierce pride that celebrated courage and independence . They cultivated a strong warrior ethic . Sure enough , even today people from Appalachia make up a disproportionate share of the U.S . military .
A lot has changed over the past three centuries , but the effects of these early settlement patterns were still evident when Fischer was writing in the 1980s . The murder rate in Massachusetts was much lower than the murder rate in Appalachia . In 1980 , the high school graduation rate was 90 percent in New England but 74 percent in Virginia .
How do I see you embracing or rejecting your culture ? How do I see you creating and contributing to your culture ? How do I see you transmitting your culture ? How do I see you rebelling against your culture ? How do I see you caught between cultures ?
